欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

采用相同规格 TA15棒材分别利用800MN 模锻压力机、1 MJ 对击模锻锤制备同种形状钛合金大型航空模锻件,对两种模锻条件下的锻件组织及力学性能进行了对比研究。结果表明:800MN 制备的锻件塑性流线分布好,每火次变形量大、变形速率低,比1 MJ 锻件再结晶晶粒尺寸小、等轴初生α相比例高且颗粒更加细小,室温、500℃高温拉伸性能以及冲击韧性和断裂韧性均有所提高。

800MN die-forging press and 1 MJ die-forging hammer were employed on TA15 titanium alloy to produce large aerial forg-ings.Microstructure and mechanical properties of TA15 forgings under the two forging equipments were investigated and compared.Re-sults show that the forgings under 800MN die-forging press have a preferable plastic flow.The 800MN die-forging press will cause lager deformation and lower strain rate during every heating.The forgings under 800MN die-forging press have more fine grain size after re-crystallization compared with those under 1 MJ die-forging hammer.It also had a higher percentage of primary alpha phase as well as more fine αprecipitation under 800MN die-forging press.As a result,its tensile properties and impact toughness and fracture toughness of the forgings are higher than those under 1 MJ forging.Furthermore,the costs and quality are more ideal under 800MN die-forging press because the strain and strain rate are more controllable and the forging times are less.

参考文献

[1] 李蓬川.大型航空模锻件的生产现状及发展趋势[J].大型铸锻件,2011(02):39-45.
[2] 王淑云,李惠曲,东赟鹏,刘趁意,王乐安.大型模锻件和模锻液压机与航空锻压技术[J].锻压装备与制造技术,2009(05):31-34.
[3] 郭鸿镇,姚泽坤,苏祖武,虢迎光,苏梅英,骆兴正,夏齐喻,楼瑞祥,武振林,谢宏,李园春,杨洪涛,王家宣.大型钛合金隔框锻件等温精密模锻试制研究[J].金属学报,2002(z1):366-369.
[4] 张行健,吕宏军,王琪,陈永来,周晓建.钛合金模锻工艺的研究进展[J].材料导报,2007(11):95-98.
[5] ZHOU W J;SUN Z C;ZUO S P et al.Shape Optimiza-tion of initial billet for TAl5 Ti-alloy complex components performing[J].RARE METAL MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING,2011,40(6):951-956.
[6] 张旺峰,王玉会,马济民.TA15钛合金大锻件热处理强化及机制[J].稀有金属,2010(01):1-5.
[7] 张旺峰;王玉会;颜孟奇 等.锻造方法对 TA15 钛合金组织和性能的影响[J].中国有色金属学报,2013,23(增刊 1):15-19.
[8] 张旺峰,李兴无,马济民,曹春晓,朱知寿.热变形参数对TA15再结晶晶粒尺寸的影响[J].金属学报,2002(z1):158-160.
[9] 张旺峰;张庆玲;李兴无 等.TA15 钛合金多火次无变形后组织性能的变化规律[J].稀有金属材料与工程,2008,37(增刊 3):608-610.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%