欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

为深入剖析国产HKT800碳纤维的微观结构和性能,用扫描电子显微镜、原子力显微镜、拉曼光谱、X射线衍射仪、压汞仪等对HKT800碳纤维进行了表征,并与东丽T800碳纤维进行了对比分析,结果表明:HKT800碳纤维的表面带有沟槽,少量碳纤维截面呈腰果形,不同于T800碳纤维,且表面粗糙度较大;HKT800碳纤维拉曼测试ID/IG比值为1.07,表面微晶尺寸较小;2种碳纤维层间距均为0.347 nm,孔隙率均为17.4%,比较一致,但HKT800碳纤维堆叠尺寸、取向度略高于T800碳纤维,而微孔偏离碳纤维轴取向程度、微孔长度、微孔横截面平均切割线长度均略低于 T800碳纤维, HKT800碳纤维中微孔尺寸、数量的分布也不同于T800碳纤维.

The microstructure and properties of domestic HKT800 carbon fibers were studied by scanning electron microscopy ( SEM), atomic force microscopy ( AFM), Raman, X?ray diffaction ( XRD) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). For the purpose of comparison, the microstructure and properties of T800 carbon fibers were also studied. The results showed that numerous grooves distributed on the surface of HKT800 carbon fibers, while few carbon fibers exhibit a cross?section of a cashew?like shape and displayed larger surface roughness, which is different from T800 carbon fibers. The ID/IG value of HKT800 carbon fiber was 1.07, indicating its smaller surface crystalline size. The interlayer spacing and porosity of both HKT800 and T800 carbon fibers, is 3.47 ? and 17.4%, respectively. However, the stack size and orientation degree of HKT800 carbon fibers were slightly higher than those of T800 carbon fibers. The size and number distribution of micropores were also different between HKT800 and T800 carbon fibers, while the HKT800 possessed lower B, L and l than T800.

参考文献

[1] 井敏;谭婷婷;王成国;冯志海;杨云华.PAN基碳纤维的微观结构与力学性能相关性分析[J].航空材料学报,2013(1):78-85.
[2] 王迎芬;彭公秋;李国丽;谢富原;刘勇.T800 H碳纤维表面特性及T800 H/BA9918复合材料湿热性能研究[J].材料科学与工艺,2015(4):115-120.
[3] 李烨;肇研;孙沛;段跃新.碳纤维表面状态对其复合材料界面性能的影响[J].材料科学与工艺,2014(2):86-91.
[4] 黄彬瑶;段跃新;杨喆;陈达;肇研.上浆剂对国产碳纤维复合材料界面性能的影响[J].材料科学与工艺,2014(5):60-65.
[5] Li-li Wang;Peng Li;Ling-cong Li.Effect of Surface Properties of T800 Carbon Fibers on Epoxy /Fiber Interface Adhesion[J].Polymers & Polymer Composites,20139(9):607-612.
[6] Zaffar M Khan;Ali Hasan Mahmood;Ben Mills.The drilling-induced failure mechanisms in T800/924C toughened carbon-epoxy composite materials[J].Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites,20142(2):202-211.
[7] Gao Aijun;Gu Yizhuo;Wu Qing;Yuan Chao;Li Min;Zhang Zuoguang.Influence of processing temperature on interfacial behavior of HKT800 carbon fiber with BMI and epoxy matrices[J].中国航空学报(英文版),2015(4):1255-1262.
[8] 顾红星;王浩静;范立东;张淑斌;庞培东.HKT800碳纤维/AG80环氧树脂复合材料制备及性能[J].功能材料,2015(15):15007-15010.
[9] 井敏;谭婷婷;王成国;冯志海;杨云华;潘月秀.东丽T800 H与T800 S碳纤维的微观结构比较[J].材料科学与工艺,2015(2):45-52.
[10] 刘福杰;范立东;王浩静;朱珍平.高强度炭纤维微观结构分析及力学性能的比较[J].功能材料,2007(10):1723-1726,1730.
[11] 王明先;王荣国;刘文博;杨永忠;赵俊青.国产高性能碳纤维组织结构表征与性能分析[J].玻璃钢/复合材料,2007(1):28-32.
[12] 刘立朋;益小苏;安学锋;张明;叶宏军.T800/5228A复合材料层间增韧改性[J].宇航材料工艺,2015(2):37-42.
[13] 井敏;谭婷婷;王成国;冯志海;杨云华;潘月秀.3种高强中模型PAN基碳纤维的微观结构比较[J].功能材料,2014(8):8028-8032.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%