欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

通过物理模拟试验,研究分析了底吹氩精炼钢包内夹杂物去除机理以及吹氩量对其的影响规律.结果表明:钢包中夹杂物的上浮主要是通过上升的钢液流携带,底吹氩量对夹杂物在钢包表面的钢-渣界面去除行为存在重要影响.吹氩量较小时,钢-渣界面稳定,夹杂物在浮力、毛细作用力等共同作用下穿过平坦的钢-渣界面而被吸收;吹氩量较大时,钢-渣界面波动大,渣眼周围发生卷渣,夹杂物被卷入的液滴吸收,随液滴进入渣层;吹氩量大,渣眼周围形成渣泡,夹杂物被渣泡吸收,随渣泡进入渣层.吹氩量达到一定时,夹杂物被钢-渣界面的吸收成为其被去除的限制性环节,且吹氩量较大时夹杂物去除效果最差,为实际吹氩精炼过程吹气量的控制提供了指导.

Based on a physical modeling of argon-stirred refining ladle,the effect of argon flow rate on the removal of non-metallic inclusions and its removal mechanism were studied. The results indicated that the floatation of inclusions to the steel-slag interface was mainly due to the rising movement of liquid steel. Argon blowing rate was one of the most important factors to remove inclusions at the steel-slag interface. When the argon flow rate was relatively low,inclu-sions would be absorbed at the steady steel-slag interface with the help of buoyancy force and other forces. With the in-crease of argon flow rate,a fluctuant steel-slag interface occurred,and some slag droplets were entrapped into steel close to the open eye. Some inclusions would be captured by these slag droplets and then float up into top slag. When the gas flow rate was high enough,some slag droplets containing some gas bubbles formed. inclusions were captured by these slag bubbles and then removed into top slag as well. When the gas flow rate increased to a certain value,the ab-sorption of inclusions at the steel-slag interface became the controlling step of inclusion removal,and the removal result became worse. The results of present study could provide a guidance for the control of argon flow during industrial refin-ing process.

参考文献

[1] 谢文新;包燕平;王敏;张旭东.GCr15轴承钢探伤缺陷与夹杂物的关系[J].钢铁,2015(3):44-48.
[2] 薛正良;王义芳;王立涛;李正邦;张家雯.用小气泡从钢液中去除夹杂物颗粒[J].金属学报,2003(4):431-434.
[3] 郑淑国;朱苗勇.吹氩钢液精炼过程气泡去夹杂机理研究[J].钢铁,2008(6):25-29.
[4] 倪冰;罗志国;狄瞻霞;邹宗树.气泡去除夹杂物的机理[J].钢铁研究学报,2010(5):15-18.
[5] Hu Lin YANG;Ping HE;Yu Chun ZHAI.Removal Behavior of Inclusions in Molten Steel by Bubble Wake Flow Based on Water Model Experiment[J].ISIJ International,20143(3):578-581.
[6] Wang L.;Lee H.G..Prediction of the Optimum Bubble Size for Inclusion Removal from Molten Steel by Flotation[J].ISIJ International,19961(1):7-16.
[7] Mats Soder;Par Jonsson;Jonas Alexis.Most relevant mechanisms of inclusion growth in an induction-stirred ladle[J].Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy,20023(3):210-220.
[8] M. Ek;L Wu;P. Valentin;D. Sichen.Effect of Inert Gas Flow Rate on Homogenization and Inclusion Removal in a Gas Stirred Ladle[J].Steel Research International,201012(12):1056-1063.
[9] Jung-Soo CHO;Hae-Geon LEE.Cold Model Study on Inclusion Removal from Liquid Steel Using Fine Gas Bubbles[J].ISIJ International,20012(2):151-157.
[10] Martin VALDEZ;George S. SHANNON;Seetharaman SRIDHAR.The Ability of Slags to Absorb Solid Oxide Inclusions[J].ISIJ International,20063(3):450-457.
[11] DIPAK MAZUMDAR.On the Estimation of Plume Rise Velocity in Gas-Stirred Ladles[J].Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, A. Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science,20026(6):937-941.
[12] 肖亚克,贾元胜,张孝棣,蒋甲利,马洪志,牛中国.流动显示与测量中的示踪粒子发生及投放布撒[C].第七届全国流动显示学术会议论文集,2008:1-8.
[13] J. STRANDH;K. NAKAJIMA;R. ERIKSSON.A mathematical model to study liquid inclusion behavior at the steel-slag interface[J].ISIJ International,200512(12):1838-1847.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%