欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

采用热压成型法制备了4种不同尺寸,即125~180μm、180~425μm、425~850μm和850~2000μm的杨木纤维(PWF)/高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)复合材料,并对PWF/HDPE复合材料进行了弯曲性能测试、冲击性能测试、动态热力学分析(DMA)、24 h蠕变-24 h回复测试和1000 h 长期蠕变测试。结果表明:PWF的尺寸过大或者过小均不利于提高 PWF/HDPE 复合材料的弯曲性能,增强效果最好的是425~850μm PWF/HDPE 复合材料,其弯曲强度达到26.71 MPa,弹性模量达到2.73 GPa;PWF长度从180μm增加到2000μm,PWF/HDPE复合材料的抗冲击性能变化不大;125~180μm PWF/HDPE复合材料的抗冲击性能较差;短 PWF/HDPE复合材料的抗蠕变性能较差,不适合在长期负载的条件下工作,而850~2000μm的长 PWF/HDPE复合材料的抗长期蠕变性能最好,且回复率最高,为78.46%;1000 h 形变仅为0.809 mm,对比其他尺寸的 PWF/HDPE 复合材料1000 h 形变的平均值降低了48.00%。

Four kinds of poplar wood fibers (PWF,125-180μm,180-425 μm,425-850μm and 850-2 000μm)/high-density polyethylene (HDPE)composites were prepared by means of hot-compression molding.The flexural property test,impact property test,dynamic thermo-mechanical analysis(DMA),24 h creep-24 h recovery test and 1 000 h long-term creep tests were performed for PWF/HDPE composites.The results show that the excessively large or small PWF size is not positively for improving the flexural property of PWF/HDPE composites.PWF/HDPE composites with fibers of 425-850 μm present the best enhancement effect.The flexural strength and the elastic modulus of 425-850μm PWF/HDPE composites are 26.71 MPa and 2.73 GPa,respectively.Impact resist-ance property of PWF/HDPE composites keeps constant,while the PWF size increases from 180μm to 2 000μm. Whereas,125-180μm PWF/HDPE composites have the lowest impact resistance property.The PWF/HDPE com-posites with small fibers have the worst anti-creep performance,indicating that it is not suitable for long-term load-ing.850-2 000μm PWF/HDPE composites with long fibers have outstanding long-term anti-creep performance and recovery (78.46%),and its 1 000 h deformation is just 0.809 mm,which compares with the average values of 1 000 h deformation for other PWF/HDPE composites and decreases by 48.00%.

参考文献

[1] 王春红;刘胜凯.碱处理对竹纤维及竹纤维增强聚丙烯复合材料性能的影响[J].复合材料学报,2015(3):683-690.
[2] 曹岩 .纤维尺寸及分布对WPCs力学性能的影响[D].东北林业大学,2013.
[3] 王伟宏;王晶晶;黄海兵;隋淑娟;王清文.纤维粒径对木塑复合材料抗老化性能的影响[J].高分子材料科学与工程,2014(5):92-97.
[4] Stark NM;Matuana LM;Clemons CM.Effect of processing method on surface and weathering characteristics of wood-flour/HDPE composites[J].Journal of Applied Polymer Science,20043(3):1021-1030.
[5] Sain MM.;Law S.;Balatinecz J..Creep fatigue in engineered wood fiber and plastic compositions[J].Journal of Applied Polymer Science,20002(2):260-268.
[6] Seena Joseph;M.S. Sreekala;Z. Oommen.A comparison of the mechanical properties of phenol formaldehyde composites reinforced with banana fibres and glass fibres[J].Composites science and technology,200214(14):1857-1868.
[7] Migneault S;Koubaa A;Erchiqui F;Chaala A;Englund K;Krause C;Wolcott M.Effect of fiber length on processing and properties of extruded wood-fiber/HDPE composites[J].Journal of Applied Polymer Science,20082(2):1085-1092.
[8] Stark NM;Rowlands RE.Effects of wood fiber characteristics on mechanical properties of wood/polypropylene composites[J].Wood and Fiber Science,20032(2):167-174.
[9] Martin Claude Ngueho Yemele;Ahmed Koubaa;Alain Cloutier.Effect of bark fiber content and size on the mechanical properties of bark/HDPE composites[J].Composites, Part A. Applied science and manufacturing,20101(1):131-137.
[10] Dikobe DG;Luyt AS.Effect of filler content and size on the properties of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer-wood fiber composites[J].Journal of Applied Polymer Science,20076(6):3645-3654.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%