欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

目的:进行表面处理工艺筛选。方法采用海洋气候多因素综合模拟加速试验技术,对镀锌三价铬钝化、镀锌六价铬钝化、镀锌镍合金、无铬锌铝涂层、拉孚铼工艺和石墨烯涂层6种汽车紧固件表面处理工艺进行试验。测定保护层初期腐蚀、保护层腐蚀10%(面积)和基体金属腐蚀10%(面积)的时间,根据检测数据评价上述工艺的保护性能并进行优劣排序。与万宁站户外暴露试验结果对比分析,验证筛选结果的正确性,同时评价海洋气候多因素综合模拟加速试验技术的加速性和相关性。结果6种表面处理工艺出现保护层初期腐蚀的时间分别为24、48、48、48、144、72 h;保护层腐蚀10%(面积)的时间分别为48、72、72、72、216、144 h;基体金属腐蚀的时间分别为216、168、432、432、432、216 h。腐蚀外观形貌变化过程与户外暴露试验相似,平均加速倍率为21。结论上述工艺保护性能优劣排序为拉孚铼工艺、无铬锌铝涂层、锌镍合金镀层、石墨烯、镀锌三价铬钝化和镀锌六价铬钝化。海洋气候多因素综合模拟加速试验技术与户外暴露试验结果相比具有高加速性和良好相关性,筛选结果正确。

Objective To screen surface treatment technologies. Methods Six kinds of automobile fastener surface treatment technologies, trivalence chromium passivated zinc plating, hexad chromium passivated zinc plating, zinc-nickel alloys plating, chromium free zinc aluminum plating, LAFRE? , and Graphene coating, were tested using a new technology—multi-factor simula-tion of marine climate and acceleration test technology. Initial corrosion time, the time of 10% surface treatment area corrosion, and the time of 10% base metal area corrosion were measured with net eye inspection method. The protection ability of the above surface treatment technologies was evaluated with inspection data. The correctness of the screening result, the acceleration and rel-ativity of the new technology were validated through comparison and analysis with outdoor exposure test results of Wanning exposure site. Results The initial corrosion time of the above surface treatment technologies was 24, 48, 48, 48, 144 and 72 hours respec-tively;the time of 10% surface treatment area corrosion was 48, 72, 72, 72, 216 and 144 hours respectively; the time of 10%base metal corrosion area was 216, 168, 432, 432, 216 and 216 hours respectively. The surface morphology changing process was similar with outdoor exposure and the average acceleration ratio was 21. Conclusion The rank by the protection ability of the above surface treatment technologies is LAFRE? technology, chromium free zinc aluminum plating, zinc-nickel alloy plating, Graphene coating, trivalence chromium passivated zinc plating, and hexad chromium passivated zinc plating. The screening is correct. The multi-factor integrated simulation of marine climate and acceleration test technologies have high acceleration and good correlativity with outdoor exposure.

参考文献

[1] 白瑞;赵九蓬;李垚;牛永安;张鑫;寇玉洁.氟化石墨烯的研究及其在表面处理方面的应用进展[J].表面技术,2014(1):131-136.
[2] 张巧云.低碳钢表面锌-铝复合涂层的研究[J].表面技术,2011(01):53-55.
[3] 李秉忠;王昌辉;董志红;马宝生;张三平;李朋.电弧喷涂Zn/Al伪合金涂层耐蚀性能研究[J].材料保护,2008(4):31-32.
[4] 边飞龙;黄燕滨;时小军;宋高伟.海洋环境下螺纹紧固件复合防腐技术[J].电镀与涂饰,2010(12):64-66.
[5] 舒畅;刘彬;周漪.锌铝/富铝复合涂层在海洋环境中的耐蚀性研究[J].表面技术,2012(5):56-59.
[6] 陈伟;唐凌燕;周英;陈刚.锌镍合金镀工艺优化及镀层耐腐蚀性的研究[J].表面技术,2015(2):110-114,133.
[7] 王艳艳;舒畅;李超.自然环境谱转化为加速试验环境谱的方法[J].装备环境工程,2014(1):34-38.
[8] 王凤平;张学元;杜元龙.大气腐蚀研究动态与进展[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2000(2):104-108,封3.
[9] 林翠;王凤平;李晓刚.大气腐蚀研究方法进展[J].中国腐蚀与防护学报,2004(4):249-256.
[10] 陈川;黄海军;王俊;赵钺;詹耀.我国湿热海上风电大气区金属重防腐涂料的性能研究[J].装备环境工程,2015(4):89-94.
[11] 钱建才;许斌;邹洪庆;吴厚昌;吕基成;方敏.2A12铝合金硬质阳极氧化及膜层性能研究[J].表面技术,2014(5):37-41.
[12] 张琳;王振尧;赵春英;曹公望;刘艳洁.碳钢和耐候钢在盐雾环境下的腐蚀行为研究[J].装备环境工程,2014(1):1-6.
[13] 陈月华;江徳凤;刘永永;袁礼华.金属镀金外壳抗盐雾腐蚀工艺的改进[J].表面技术,2015(6):93-97,132.
[14] 刘峰;宋弘清;黄政然;范亚洲;林岳凌;龙紫筠;许立坤.沿海地区输电铁塔防护涂层耐腐蚀性能研究[J].装备环境工程,2015(4):76-81,88.
[15] 王秀静;陈克勤;张炬;张三平;萧以德.金属大气暴露与模拟加速腐蚀结果相关性探讨[J].装备环境工程,2012(1):94-98,104.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%