欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

针对通孔焊点进行了热冲击的可靠性测试,以非破坏性和破坏性的实验方法,对比分析了波峰焊点和再流焊点的抗热疲劳能力.结果表明,CTE(热膨胀系数)失配是焊点产生裂纹的主要原因,而焊点形态的差异又使得再流焊点内部断裂程度不同于波峰焊点.再流焊点裂纹产生在钎料内部;而波峰焊点由于具有饱满的圆角过渡形态,裂纹产生在镀铜孔与线路板的连接拐角处.裂纹的产生导致了两种焊点强度的降低,对其电性能的影响却甚微.

参考文献

[1] Zarrow P, Kopp D. Print Circ Design, 1997; 14(2): 25
[2] Glenn R R, Nguyen N. Circ Assem, 1998; 9(11): 32
[3] Belmonte J, Zarrow P. Circ Assem, 1996; 7(9): 36
[4] Hymes L. Circ Assem, 1999; 10(4): 28
[5] Glenn R R. Circ Assem, 1999; 10(4): 32
[6] William E. Coleman, Denis J, Julie R, Bradbury-Bennett.Solder Surf Mount Technol, 2000; 12(3): 8
[7] Rutter G. Electr Pack Prod, 1997; 37(6): 99
[8] Islam J. Electr Prod, 2000; 29(2): 29
[9] Barker D, Pecht M, Dasgupta A, Naqvi S. J Electron Packag, 1991; 113(2): 149
[10] Colin Lea. In: Des Plaines ed, Proc Tech Program Natl Electron Packag Prod Conf, California, Anaheim: Cahner Exposition Group, 1991:23
[11] Zhang W, Wang C Q. In: Zhang Qun ed, HDP's02-IEEE Symp on High Density Packag and Component Failure Analysis in Electron, Shanghai: IEEE, 2002:221
[12] Wang Z P, Tan Y M, Chua K M. Microelectron Reliab,1999; 39:1351
[13] Zhao X J, Wang C Q, Wang G Z, Zheng G Q, Yang S Q.IEEE Trans Electron Packag Manu, 2000; 23(2): 87
[14] Kanchanomai C, Miyashita Y, Mutoh Y. Int J Fatig, 2002;24:987
[15] Tu P L, Chan Y C, Tang C W, Hung K C, Lai J K L.IEEE Trans Adv Pack, 2001; 24(2): 197
[16] Chan Y C, So Alex C K, Lai J K L. Mater Sci Eng B,1998; 55:5
[17] Pang H L J, Tan K H, Shi X Q, Wang Z P. Mater Sci Eng A, 2001; 307:42
[18] Lee H T, Chen M H. Mater Sci Eng A, 2002; 333:24
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%