在600℃拉伸条件下,Ti-60钛合金电子束焊接接头的熔合区和热影响区抗变形能力强于母材区(BM),试样断裂于母材区.在600℃持久条件下,当加载应力≤550 MPa时,接头变形以扩散控制的位错攀移为主,变形能力取决于显微组织中的板条边界密度,板条越细,边界密度越高,变形能力越大,断裂位置在接头熔合区;当加载应力接近或550 MPa(母材区屈服强度附近)时,接头的变形以位错滑移为主,断裂位置在母材区.在600℃高周疲劳条件下,疲劳裂纹易萌生于接头母材区,裂纹形核位置在试样的表面或次表面. TEM观察表明,接头母材区的变形以贯穿板条集束的位错滑移为主;而接头熔合区中的位错则局限在单个马氏体板条内部,位错运动特征为攀移及少量滑移.
参考文献
| [1] | Division of Titanium alloys of IMR.Unpublished Work for Ti-60 Alloys,Division of Titanium Alloys.Institute of Metal Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang,2002(Ti-60合金内部资料集.中国科学院金属研究所,沈阳,2002) |
| [2] | Liu J R.Ph.D.Dissertation,Institute of Metal Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang,2004.(刘建荣,中国科学院金属研究所博士学位论文,沈阳,2004) |
| [3] | BaeslackⅢ W A,Becker D W,Froes F H,J Met,1984; 36:46 |
| [4] | Barreda J L,Santamaria F,Azpiroz X,Irisarri A M,Varona J M.Vacuum,2001; 62:143 |
| [5] | Murthy K K,Sundaresan S.Weld J,1997; 76:81s |
| [6] | Murthy K K,Sundaresan S,Potluri N B.Eng Fract Mech,1997; 58:29 |
| [7] | Mohandas T,Banerjee D,Kutumbarao V V.Mater Sci Eng,1999; A269:217 |
| [8] | Oh J,Kim N J,Lee S,Lee E W.Mater Sci Eng,2003; A340:232 |
| [9] | Mohandas T,Banerjee D,Kutumbarao V V.Mater Sci Eng,1998; A254:147 |
| [10] | Burgers W G.Physica,1934; 1:561 |
| [11] | Li G P.PhD Dissertation,Institute of Metal Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang,1995(李阁平.中国科学院金属研究所博士学位论文,沈阳,1995) |
| [12] | Lei J F.PhD Dissertation,Institute of Metal Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang,1997(雷家峰.中国科学院金属研究所博士学位论文,沈阳,1997) |
| [13] | Mohandas T,Banerjee D,Mahajan Y R,Kutumbarao V V.J Mater Sci,1996; 31:3769 |
| [14] | Lin F S,Starke E A,Jr,Chakrabortty S B,Gysler A.Metall Trans,1984; 15A:1229 |
| [15] | Andres C,Gysler A,Lütjering G.Z Metallkd,1997; 88:197 |
上一张
下一张
上一张
下一张
计量
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
文章评分
- 您的评分：
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%