不同状态纯Mg试样在75-200℃,15-40 MPa条件下的蠕变实验表明:在等同条件下,铸态试样的晶粒粗大,蠕变速率较低;挤压态试样由于动态再结晶,晶粒变细,蠕变速率大幅上升;退火后由于晶粒长大,蠕变速率又呈下降趋势.根据应变速率幂指数公式,铸态纯Mg试样在较低应力时,应力指数n处于4.3-4.9的范围,在较高应力时,n7;激活能在76.0-89.4 kJ/mol的范围.根据应力指数和激活能并结合蠕变过程中的组织分析,纯Mg的蠕变受位错攀移、晶界滑移以及孪生的共同作用,其中位错攀移和品界滑移占主导地位.
参考文献
[1] | Luo A A.Int Mater Rev,2004; 49:13 |
[2] | Wang Q D,Zeng X Q,Lü Y Z,Ding W J.Mater Rev,2000; 14(3):21(王渠东,曾小勤,吕宜振,丁文江.材料导报,2000;14(3):21) |
[3] | Wang X Q,Li Q A,Zhang X Y.Light Metals,2007; 6:45(王小强,李全安,张兴渊.轻金属,2007;6:45) |
[4] | Zhang J,Pan F S,Li Z S.Foundry,2004; 53:770(张静,潘复生,李忠盛.铸造,2004;53:770) |
[5] | Mordike B L.Mater Sci Eng,2002; A324:103 |
[6] | Pekguleryuz M O,Kaya A A.Adv Eng Mater,2003; 12:866 |
[7] | Zhang X M,Peng Z K,Chen J M,Deng Y L.Chin J Nonferr Metals,2004; 14:1443(张新明,彭卓凯,陈健美,邓运来.中国有色金属学报,2004;14:1443) |
[8] | Shi L,Northwood D O.Acta Metall Mater,1994; 42:871 |
[9] | Jones R B,Harris J E.Joint Int Conf Creep,Part 3A,London:The Institution of Mechanical Engineers,1963:1 |
[10] | Vagarali S S,Langdon T G.Acta Metall,1981; 29:1969 |
[11] | Roberts S.Trans Am Inst Min MetaU Eng,1953; 197:732 |
[12] | Milicka K,Cadek J,Rys P.Acta Metall,1970; 18:1071 |
[13] | Kim W J,Chung S W,Chung C S,Kum D.Acta Mater,2001; 49:3337 |
[14] | Chung S W,Watanabe H,Kim W J,Higashi K.Mater Trans JIM,2004; 45:1266 |
[15] | Kassner M E,Pérez-Prado M T.Fundamentals of Creep in Metals and Alloys.Oxford:Elsevier Ltd.,2004:1 |
[16] | Sherby O D,Burke P M.Prog Mater Sci,1968; 13:323 |
[17] | Sherby O D,Weertman J.Acta Metall,1979; 27:387 |
[18] | Poirier J P.Acta Metall,1978; 26:629 |
[19] | Nabarro F R N.Mater Sci Eng,2004; A387-389:659 |
[20] | Nabarro F R N.Acta Mater,2006; 54:263 |
[21] | Tegart W J.Acta Metall,1961; 9:614 |
[22] | Northwood D O,Daly K E,Smith I O.Mater Sci Eng,1985; 72:51 |
[23] | Langdon T G.Philos Mag,1970; 22(178):689 |
[24] | Langdon T G.J Mater Sci,2006; 41:597 |
[25] | Bell R L,Langdon T G.J Mater Sci,1967; 2:313 |
上一张
下一张
上一张
下一张
计量
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
文章评分
- 您的评分:
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%