欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

为验证现行夹层结构压剪试验方法对高剪切模量夹层结构的适用性,应用有限元分析了影响该试验方法测量精度的因素,结果表明加载金属板端部弯曲效应对试验精度有较大影响,对高剪切模量芯材的夹层结构影响更甚,当剪切模量高于100 MPa时其误差可超过6%.根据对试验系统参数的分析,提出了一种改进的压剪试验方法,改变加载方式降低弯曲效应,对于剪切模量小于500 MPa的夹层结构,可以将弯曲效应引起的误差降低到小于3%;同时发现新的加载方式对夹具尺寸参数变化的灵敏度降低,有利于提高试验的可靠性.

参考文献

[1] 黄涛.缝纫泡沫夹层复合材料力学性能研究[D].西安:西北工业大学,2004.
[2] 杜龙.X-cot夹层复合材料力学性能研究[D].西安:西北工业大学,2007.
[3] Marasco A I,Cartie D D R,Partridge I K.Mechanical properties balance in novel Z-pinned sandwich panels:Out-of-plane properties[J].Composites Part A:Applied Science and Manufacturing,2006,37:295-302.
[4] Carstensen T C,Kunkel E,Magee C.X-Cor advanced sandwich core material[C]//33rd International SAMPE Technical Conference.Seattle,WA:Sikorsky Aircraft,2001:452-466.
[5] O'Brien K T,Paris I L.Exploratory investigation of failure mechanisms in transition regions between solid laminates and X-cot truss sandwich[J].Composites Structures,2002,57:189-204.
[6] Lingaiah K,Suryanarayana B.Strength and stiffness of sandwich beams in bending[J].Exp Mech,1991,31(1):1-7.
[7] Steeves C A,Fleck N A.Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core.loaded in threepoint bending,Part Ⅰ:Analytical models and minimum weight design[J].International Journal of Mechanical Sciences,2004,46:561-583.
[8] Chen C,Harte A M,Fleck N.The plastic collapse of sandwich beams with a metallic foam core[J].Int J Mech Sci,2001,43(6):1483-1506.
[9] McCormack T,Miller R,Kesler O,Gibson L.Failure of sandwich beams with metallic foam cores[J].Int J Solids Struct,2001,38(28/29):4901-4920.
[10] Rice M C,Fleischer C A,Zupan M.Study on the collapse of pin-reinforced foam sandwich panel cores[J].Experimental MechaniCS,2006,46(2):197-204.
[11] O'Connor D J.A comparison of test methods for shear properties of the cores of sandwich construction[J].J Test Eval,1989,17(4):241-246.
[12] Grediac M,Dufort L.Experimental evidence of parasitic effects in shear test on sandwich beams[J].Exp Mech,2002,42(2):186-193.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%