以抗拉强度700和780 MPa级新型热轧纳米析出强化钢为研究对象,通过裂纹尖端张开位移法实验评价其断裂韧性,探讨显微组织类型、大角度晶界、位错密度及纳米尺寸析出物对断裂韧性的影响机理.结果表明,实验温度为室温、-10和-30℃时,700 MPa级钢的条件启裂值δQ0.2BL和δ0.2均大于780 MPa级钢,700 MPa级钢的断裂韧性优于780 MPa级钢.700 MPa级钢与780 MPa级钢的显微组织差异主要包含4个方面:(1) 700 MPa级钢的显微组织以铁素体为主,而780 MPa级钢的显微组织以贝氏体铁素体为主;(2) 700 MPa级钢中的碳化物形态为颗粒状或短棒状,而780 MPa级钢中的碳化物以长条状为主;(3) 780 MPa级钢的位错密度显著高于700 MPa级钢;(4) 700和780 MPa级钢中的大角度晶界比例分别为85.6%和76.8%.因此,提高铁素体体积分数和大角度晶界比例、细化碳化物尺寸及降低位错密度可有效提高钢板的断裂韧性;700和780 MPa级钢显微组织中粗大析出物(Nb,Ti)CN及晶界析出物会使钢板韧性恶化,铁素体或贝氏体基体上半共格析出的纳米尺度(Nb,Ti)C对韧性损害较小.
参考文献
[1] | Zhong Q P,Zhao Z H.Fractography.Beijing:Higher Education Press,2006:244(钟群鹏,赵子华.断口学.北京:高等教育出版社,2006:244) |
[2] | Lacroix G,Pardoen T,Jacques P J.Acta Mater,2008; 56:3900 |
[3] | Chen X,Li Y X,Fu H G.Acta Metall Sin,2005; 41:1061(陈祥,李言祥,符寒光.金属学报,2005; 41:1061) |
[4] | Bi Z Y,Yang J,Niu J,Zhang J X.Acta Metall Sin,2013; 49:576(毕宗岳,杨军,牛靖,张建勋.金属学报,2013; 49:576) |
[5] | Firrao D,Matteis P,Spena P R,Gerosa R.Mater Sci Eng,2013; A559:371 |
[6] | Seshu Kumar A,Ravi Kumar B,Datta G L,Ranganath V R.Mater Sci Eng,2010; A527:954 |
[7] | Ren Z J,Ru C Q.Eng Fract Mech,2013; 99:214 |
[8] | Fan Z Y.Mater Sci Eng,1995; A191:73 |
[9] | Lai G Y,Wood W E,Clark R A,Zackay V F,Parker E R.Metall Mater Trans,1974; 5B:1663 |
[10] | Shi Y W,Han Z X.J Mater Process Technol,2008; 207:30 |
[11] | Kim S,Lee S,Lee B S.Mater Sci Eng,2003; A359:198 |
[12] | Youngblood J L,Raghavan M.Metall Mater Trans,1977; 8A:1439 |
[13] | Cao W D,Lu X P.Metall Mater Trans,1987; 18A:1569 |
[14] | Ma Y,Pan T,Jiang B,Cui Y H,Su H,Peng Y.Acta Metall Sin,2011; 47:978(马跃,潘涛,江波,崔银会,苏航,彭云.金属学报,2011:47:978) |
[15] | Wang X N,Di H S,Du L X.Acta Metall Sin,2012; 48:621(王晓南,邸洪双,杜林秀.金属学报,2012; 48:621) |
[16] | Wang X N,Du L X,Di H S,Xie H,Gu D H.Steel Res Int,2011; 82:1417 |
[17] | Zhong Y,Xiao F R,Zhang J W,Shan Y Y,Wang W,Yang K.Aata Mater,2006; 54:435 |
[18] | Mills W J.J Test Eval,1981; 9(1):56 |
[19] | Landes J D.Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct,1995; 18:1289 |
[20] | Sakamoto H,Toyama K,Hirakawa K.Mater Sci Eng,2000; A285:288 |
[21] | Fang H S,Liu D Y,Xu P G,Bai B Z,Yang Z G.Mater Mech Eng,2001; 25:1(方鸿生,刘东雨,徐平光,白秉哲,杨志刚.机械工程材料,2001:25:1) |
[22] | Griffith A A.Philos Trans R Soc,1920; 221A:163 |
[23] | Lee K H,Kim M C,Yang W J,Lee B S.Mater Sci Eng,2013; A565:158 |
[24] | Qian C F,Jiang Z J,Chen P,Duan C H,Cui W Y.Acta Metall Sin,2004; 40:159(钱才富,姜忠军,陈平,段成红,崔文勇.金属学报,2004; 40:159) |
[25] | Xu J Q.Strength of Materials.Shanghai:Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press,2009:59(许金泉.材料强度学.上海:上海交通大学出版社,2009:59) |
[26] | Hwang B,Kim C G,Lee T.Metall Mater Trans,2010; 41A:85 |
[27] | Byun J S,Shim J H,Cho Y W,Lee D N.Acta Mater,2003; 51:1593 |
[28] | Yong Q L.Second Phases in Structural Steels.Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press,2006:145(雍岐龙.钢铁材料中的第二相.北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:145) |
[29] | Deardo A J.In:Bordignon P J P,Carneiro T,Duncombe J eds.,The Fundamental Physical Metallurgy of Niobium in Steels.Warrendale:TMS,2003:427 |
[30] | Wang X N,Du L X,Zhang H L,Di H S.J Iron Steel Res,2011; 23(5):45(王晓南,杜林秀,张海仑,邸洪双.钢铁研究学报,2011:23(5):45) |
上一张
下一张
上一张
下一张
计量
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
文章评分
- 您的评分:
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%