欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

建立了超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆质谱联用方法,检测血浆和尿液中的α-龙葵碱、α-卡茄碱和茄啶。样品经2%(v / v,下同)甲酸水溶液等量稀释,再经混合型阳离子交换固相萃取柱(MCX SPE)净化,以0.1%甲酸乙腈溶液和含0.05%甲酸的5 mmol / L 乙酸铵水溶液作为流动相进行梯度洗脱,在 UPLC BEH C 18色谱柱上实现分离,正离子电喷雾串联质谱多反应监测(ESI-MS / MS MRM)方式检测,基质匹配外标法定量。一次进样分析时间为5.5 min。血浆和尿液中3种待测物的线性范围均为0.3~100 ng / mL,相关系数为0.997~0.999;样品的检出限为0.1 ng / mL,定量限为0.3 ng / mL;血浆和尿液中的平均加标回收率分别为82%~112%和96%~114%,相对标准偏差为4.0%~16%和2.7%~17%(n =6)。方法简单、准确、灵敏,适用于马铃薯中毒检测。

An ultra-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS / MS)method was developed for the determination of α-solanine,α-chaconine and solanidine in plasma and urine. The sample was acidified with aqueous solution containing 2%(v / v if not specified)formic acid,and then cleaned-up by solid-phase extraction with a mixed-mode cation exchange(MCX)cartridge. The analysis of the glycoalkaloids was carried out on an Acquity UPLC BEH C 18 column(50 mm×2. 1 mm,1. 7 μm)with gradient elution of acetoni-trile(containing 0. 1% formic acid)and H 2 O( containing 0. 05% formic acid and 5. 0 mmol / L ammonium acetate ). The analytes were detected by positive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry in MRM mode,and quantified by external matrix-matched standard calibra-tion. The cycle time of each analysis was 5. 5 min. The calibration curves were linear in the range of 0. 3-100 ng / mL of the glycoalkaloids in plasma and urine. The correlation coefficients were 0. 997- 0. 999. The limits of detection( S / N = 3)and quantitation( S / N = 10)were 0. 1 ng / mL and 0. 3 ng / mL. The average recoveries were 82% -112% and 96% -114% for the glycoal-kaloids spiked in plasma and urine,respectively,with relative standard deviations of 4. 0% -16% and 2. 7% - 17% ( n = 6). The method is simple,accurate and sensitive to detect the gly-coalkaloids in plasma and urine for both clinical and forensic purposes.

参考文献

[1] Langkilde S;Mandimika T;Schrder M.[J].Food and Chemical Toxicology,200947(06):1099.
[2] 巩江;倪士峰;邱莉惠.[J].安徽农业科学,200937(09):4108.
[3] 李美;熊兴耀;胡新喜.[J].湖南农业科学,2012(23):84.
[4] Friedman M.[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,200654(23):8655.
[5] 杨煜;王学工;王闯.[J].中国公共卫生,199511(03):133.
[6] 肖文军;李勤;熊兴耀.[J].分析化学,201139(09):1459.
[7] Laurila J;Laakso I;Vnnen T.[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,199947(07):2738.
[8] Abell D C;Sporns P.[J].Journal of AOAC International,199982(04):908.
[9] Friedman M;Bautista F F;Stanker L H.[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,199846(12):5097.
[10] Cataldi T R I;Lelario F;Bufo S A.[J].Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry,200519(21):3103.
[11] Shakya R;Navarre D A.[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,200856(16):6949.
[12] Matsuda F;Morino K;Miyazawa H.[J].Phytochemical Analysis,200415(02):121.
[13] Sheridan R S;Kemnah J L.[J].Journal of Chromatography Science,201048(10):790.
[14] 伍慧敏;曾静;李美.[J].食品科学,201334(24):121.
[15] Hellenas K E;Nyman A;Slanina P.[J].J Chromatogr Biomed Appl,1992573(01):69.
[16] 陈聪;严慧;沈保华.[J].色谱,201230(05):445.
[17] 汤瑶;张双庆;李响.[J].色谱,201230(02):154.
[18] 张秀尧;蔡欣欣;张晓艺.[J].色谱,201028(01):23.
[19] Commission Decision 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002.Implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC Concerning the Performance of Analytical Methods and the Interpretation of Results(2002)[J].Off J Eur CommL221:8.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%