欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

利用示波冲击试验,以小角度多试样冲击试验结果为标准,对几种单试样测试材料动态弹塑性断裂韧度JId值的方法进行了比较.结果表明:最大载荷前能量方法只适用于测试启裂后无显著形变强化的高强钢;柔度变化率方法不宜于测试撕裂阻力较高的材料;而对于裂尖钝化时近似呈半圆形的材料,利用饱和伸张区宽度方法可以方便地得到材料的JId值.

参考文献

[1] Tseng M K;Marcus H L .A single specimen determination of aluminum alloys[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1982,16:895-903.
[2] Chen B Y;Shi Y W .A comparison of various dynamic elastoplastic fracture toughness evaluating procedure by instrumented impact test[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1990,36(01):17-26.
[3] Rice J R;Paris P C;Merkle J G.Some further results of J-integral analysis and estimates[A].Baltimore,Md,1973:245.
[4] Hai Qiu;Manabu Enoki;Yoshiaki Kawaguchi .A model for the dynamic fracture toughness of ductile structural steel[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2003(5):589-598.
[5] 姜凤春;刘瑞堂;刘殿魁 .动态弹塑性断裂韧性测试方法的比较研究[J].实验力学,1999,14(02):267-272.
[6] Server W L .General yielding of Charpy V notch and precracked Charpy specimens[J].ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology,1978,100:183-187.
[7] Lautridou J C .Crack initiation and stable crack growth resistance in A508 steels in relation to inclusion distribution[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1981,15:55-71.
[8] Gregory P Gibson;Druce S G.Some observations on J-R curves[A].Ann Arbor,MI,1985:166-182.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%