欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

为了研究FRP筋混凝土梁面板的承载能力,采用了大型商用软件ABAQUS对Sherif EI-Gamal等的钢混桥梁模型进行了数值模拟.将非线性有限元计算结果同试验结果进行对比分析,非线性有限元的计算结果与试验结果吻合良好.基于数值模准确的分析结果,对结构体系中的压缩薄膜效应进行了分析,并开展了一系列的参数学习,包括混凝土强度、支撑梁刚度以及横隔梁.分析结果表明,压缩薄膜效应对FRP筋混凝土桥面板的承载能力有显著的影响.

参考文献

[1] Onofrei,M .Durability of GFRP reinforced concrete from field demonstration structures[OL].ISIS Canada Research Network,2005.
[2] NanniA.FRP reinforcement for concrete structures[M].ElsevierScience,Publishers,1993
[3] 薛伟辰,康清梁.纤维塑料筋粘结锚固性能的试验研究[J].工业建筑,1999(12):5-7.
[4] Yu Zheng .Modelling of Compressive Membrane Action in Bridge Decks[D].The Queen’s University,Belfast,2004.
[5] Zheng Yu;Robinson D;Taylor S et al.Nonlinear finite element analysis of compressive membrane action in concrete slabs[J].ICE Proceoding-Bridge Engineering,2008,161(01):21-31.
[6] 沈聚敏;王传志;江见鲸.钢筋混凝土有限元与板壳极限分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1993:396-410.
[7] 李永春 .钢筋混凝土矩形板薄膜压缩效应的有限元分析[D].武 汉:华中科技大学,2004.
[8] Taylor SE;Rankin GIB;Cleland DJ .Arching action in high strength concrete slabs[J].ICE Proc Stucture Buildings,2001,146(04):353-362.
[9] Rankin G I B;Long A E .Arching action strength enhancement in laterally restrained slabs strips[J].ICE Proceedings-Structures and Buildings Buildings,1997,122(04):461-467.
[10] Kirkpatrick J;Rankin G I B;Long AE .Strength evaluation of M-beam bridge decks[J].Structures Engineering,1984,62b(03):60-68.
[11] 东南大学;同济大学;天津大学.混凝土结构[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007:4-55.
[12] Sheif EI-Gamal;Ehab EI-Salakawy;Brahim Bemokrane.ith FiberReinforced Polymer Bars Under Concentrated Loads[J].ACI Structural Journal,2005:727-735.
[13] Yu Zheng;Des Robinson;Su Taylor;David Cleland.Finite element investigation of the structural behaviour of deck in composite bridges[J].Engineering Structures,2009:1762-1776.
[14] ABAQUS Version 6.8 Documentation[EB/OL].
[15] 张劲,王庆扬,胡守营,王传甲.ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数验证[J].建筑结构,2008(08):127-130.
[16] S.ETaylor;G.I.B.Rankin;D.J.Cleland.Real Strength of highperformance concrete bridge deck slabs[J].Bridge Engineering,2005(156 issue BE2):81-90.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%