用溶质截留法和液-液排除法对两根TiO2和ZrO2无机陶瓷超滤膜进行表征.溶质截留法所测得TiO2和ZrO2膜的平均孔径(μp)和几何标准偏差(σp)分别为30.8 nm,25.4 nm和1.82,1.58.液-液排除法测得TiO2和ZrO2膜的平均孔径分别为71.2 nm,54 nm,大约是溶质截留法的2.2倍.两种测定方法的结果均显示,TiO2膜的平均孔径大于ZrO2膜,而且TiO2膜的孔径分布较宽,但从最可几孔径来看,两种膜比较接近.对同一根膜而言两种表征方法测得的孔径分布的基本形状相似.实验结果表明两种方法都能较好的反映膜的孔径分布,将二者结合起来对超滤膜的表征有很好的借鉴意义.
参考文献
| [1] | Michaels A S .Analysis and prediction of sieving curves for ultrafiltration membranes:A universal correlation[J].Separation Science and Technology,1980,15:1350-1322. |
| [2] | Singh S.;Matsuura T.;Ramamurthy P.;Khulbe KC. .Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy[J].Journal of Membrane Science,1998(1):111-127. |
| [3] | Kassotis J;Shmidt J;Hodgins L T et al.Modeling of the pore size distribution of ultrafiltration membranes[J].Journal of Membrane Science,1985,22:61-76. |
| [4] | T. Gumi;M. Valiente;K.C. Khulbe;C. Palet;T. Matsuura .Characterization of activated composite membranes by solute transport, contact angle measurement, AFM and ESR[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2003(1/2):123-134. |
| [5] | Khayet M;Matsuura T .Determination of surface and bulk pore sizes of flat-sheet and hollow-fiber membranes by atomic force microscopy,gas permeation and solute transport method[J].Desalination,2003,158:57-64. |
| [6] | Calvo J I;Bottino A;Capannelli G et al.Comparison of liquid-liquid displacement porosimetry and scanning dectron microscopy image analysis to characterize ultrafiltration track-etched membranes[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2004,239:189-197. |
| [7] | 曾坚贤,邢卫红,徐南平.多通道陶瓷超滤膜孔径分布及截留率测定[J].水处理技术,2001(05):249-254. |
| [8] | 诸爱士,林贤诉,高兴.液-液置换法测试超滤膜孔径及其分布的研究[J].浙江科技学院学报,2004(04):239-243. |
上一张
下一张
上一张
下一张
计量
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
文章评分
- 您的评分：
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%