欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

测试了不同规格T700级炭纤维的表面形貌和起毛量,设计和模拟预浸料制备过程中的炭纤维损伤实验,考察了预浸料制备过程中各关键环节的炭纤维力学性能,并测试了复合材料基本力学性能和观察了复合材料90°拉伸破坏试样断面形貌,最后结合上述实验结果对T700级炭纤维复合材料基本力学性能进行了对比与分析。结果表明,A-3K和A-12K炭纤维表面粗糙度大,炭纤维与树脂基体机械锚定力大,可在一定程度上提高复合材料界面黏结性能;T700SC-12K炭纤维表面光滑,准直度较高,耐磨性最好,预浸料制备过程中炭纤维损伤最小,炭纤维性能转化率最高,T700SC-12K/QY9611复合材料0°拉伸强度最高;A-12K/QY9611复合材料界面性能与A-3K/QY9611复合材料相当,但拉伸性能略低。

Three types of T700 carbon fibers, A-3K, A-12K and T700SC-12K, were used as reinforcements of carbon fiber/bis-maleimide resin composites. The surface roughness and fuzziness of the three fibers, their damage in the preparation of the prepreg and the mechanical properties of the final composites were compared. Results indicate that the surface roughness and fuzziness of A-3K and A-12K produced using a wet-spinning method are larger than that of T700SC-12K from a dry-jet wet-spinning method. The tensile strength retention ratio in the direction parallel to the fiber axis from fibers to composites of T700SC-12K is higher than those of A-3K and A-12K, owing to the smooth surface, best wear resistance and the minimum damage produced during the preparation of the prepreg for the former. The decreasing order of tensile strength in the direction parallel to the fiber axis of the composites is T700SC-12K, A-3K and A-12K. The interfacial bonding for the composites from A-3K and A-12K is much better compared with T700SC-12K because the former two have stronger mechanical anchoring between fibers and resin matrix than the third.

参考文献

[1] J.C.Chen;I.R.Harrison.Modfiication of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) carbon fiber precursor via post-spinning plasticization and stretching in dimethyl formamide (DMF)[J].Carbon: An International Journal Sponsored by the American Carbon Society,20021(1):25-45.
[2] 曹春晓.一代材料技术,一代大型飞机[J].航空学报,2008(03):701-706.
[3] 杜善义.先进复合材料与航空航天[J].复合材料学报,2007(01):1-12.
[4] Huiyang Luo;Samit Roy;Hongbing Lu.Dynamic compressive behavior of unidirectional IM7/5250-4 laminate after thermal oxidation[J].Composites science and technology,20122(2):159-166.
[5] Lirui Yao;Min Li;Qing Wu;Zhishuang Dai;Yizhuo Gu;Yanxia Li;Zuoguang Zhang.Comparison of sizing effect of T700 grade carbon fiber on interfacial properties of fiber/BMI and fiber/epoxy[J].Applied Surface Science: A Journal Devoted to the Properties of Interfaces in Relation to the Synthesis and Behaviour of Materials,2012:326-333.
[6] 封彤波;肇研;罗云烽;丁东;段跃新;张佐光.不同上浆剂的国产碳纤维复合材料湿热性能研究[J].材料工程,2009(10):36-40.
[7] Yunfeng Luo;Yan Zhao;Yuexin Duan;Shanyi Du.Surface and wettability property analysis of CCF300 carbon fibers with different sizing or without sizing[J].Materials & design,20112(2):941-946.
[8] 李敏;张宝艳.改性双马树脂/碳纤维复合材料体系耐湿热性能研究[J].热固性树脂,2006(5):25-27.
[9] 张利军;肇研;罗云烽;段跃新.湿热循环对CCF300/QY8911复合材料界面性能的影响[J].材料工程,2012(2):25-29,49.
[10] Baklanova NI;Zaitsev BN;Titov AT;Zima TM.The chemistry, morphology, topography of titanium carbide modified carbon fibers[J].Carbon: An International Journal Sponsored by the American Carbon Society,20082(2):261-271.
[11] C. Marieta;F. Schulz;I. Mondragon.Characterization of interfacial behaviour in carbon-fibre/cyanate composites[J].Composites science and technology,20022(2):299-309.
[12] 曹霞;温月芳;张寿春;杨永岗.耐温型炭纤维乳液上浆剂[J].新型炭材料,2006(4):337-342.
[13] 李东风;王浩静;贺福;王心葵.T300和T700炭纤维的结构与性能[J].新型炭材料,2007(1):59-64.
[14] 张宝艳;石峰晖;周正刚;杨继萍;代志双.碳纤维表面分析及双马树脂复合材料界面研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2009(21):69-72.
[15] Pei Sun;Yan Zhao;Yunfeng Luo;Lili Sun.Effect of temperature and cyclic hygrothermal aging on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon fiber/bismaleimide (BMI) composite[J].Materials & design,20118/9(8/9):4341-4347.
[16] Dilsiz Nursel;Wightman J.P..Surface analysis of unsized and sized carbon fibers[J].Carbon: An International Journal Sponsored by the American Carbon Society,19997(7):1105-1114.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%